New DMARC Authentication system looks to bring SPF and DKIM together under one system, and it’s supported by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and PayPal
Cnet says AOL, Bank of America, Fidelity Investments, American Greetings, LinkedIn, and e-mail security providers Agari, Cloudmark, eCert, Return Path, and Trusted Domain Project.
To me this sounds like great news for us all, both senders and email inbox subscribers.
How Does DMARC Work?
A DMARC policy allows a sender to indicate that their emails are protected by SPF and/or DKIM, and tells a receiver what to do if neither of those authentication methods passes – such as junk or reject the message. DMARC removes guesswork from the receiver’s handling of these failed messages, limiting or eliminating the user’s exposure to potentially fraudulent & harmful messages. DMARC also provides a way for the email receiver to report back to the sender about messages that pass and/or fail DMARC evaluation.
You can read the full DMARC specification here….
UPDATE: Niche-ing out my sites now on G+.
First up is my WordPress, Website Security and Email Delivery site.
While I love G+ biz pages, I am looking forward to better marketing tools soon.
Cool page, but how do I convert followers there to where I really want to drive my traffic which is here?
There really needs to be some better conversion tools for these pages, don’t you think?
Facebook Email by invite only, non friends are blocked by default and more…
Zuckerberg says “But it’s not email…”
“It’s not e-mail. It handles e-mail in addition to Facebook messages, and Facebook IM, and other IM and SMS and all the other different ways that you want to communicate,” Zuckerberg said. “It’s true, people are going to be able to have Facebook.com e-mail addresses, but it’s not e-mail.”
- Incoming mail to a @facebook.com account will be blocked by default if you are not mutual friends on Facebook.
- From the data that had been researched by Compete Pulse, the growth of web-based email users as a whole decreased by approximately 11% from year to year.
- By this study, email will cease to expand at all within less than nine years, and the decline of email has already begun.
- Zuckerberg said no voice or video chat will be available soon, but that option may come into play depending on demand for it.
- As marketers, those of us who create large followings on popular content delivery streams, think Twitter, YouTube, Google Buzz and Facebook, will be positioned to better survive and even thrive into the next decade.
- In my personal testing in the last 3 years, email still converts better than any social medium, the idea is to get your social following into your autoresponder / email list.
- If you are going to accept Facebook email addresses in your autoresponder forms, stressing how to whitelist your email address will be very important.
- Want to try Facebook email for yourself? Invite only….
Get your Facebook email invite here!
Let us know what you think about Facebook’s Inbox in the comments below…
A Facebook email delivery process makes me shiver even in sunny Arizona, here’s why….
Before you label this as Facebook bashing and bounce, I want to make it clear this is about email delivery, it has nothing to do with Facebook, this is about Getting your email to the Inbox.
With TechCrunch’s Friday rumor that Facebook will be launching their own Facebook inbox Monday….
Facebook’s secret Project Titan — a web-based email client that we hear is unofficially referred to internally as its “Gmail killer”. Now we’ve heard from sources that this is indeed what’s coming on Monday during Facebook’s special event, alongside personal @facebook.com email addresses for users.
Our understanding is that this is more than just a UI refresh for Facebook’s existing messaging service with POP access tacked on. Rather, Facebook is building a full-fledged webmail client, and while it may only be in early stages come its launch Monday, there’s a huge amount of potential here. – TechCrunch
TechZine made these points on Why You Won’t Use Facebook Email….
- You’re already accustomed to your current email provider
- Facebook’s privacy issue rows are at the back of your mind
- Facebook is already well branded for what they are and that’s not an email service
Well that’s the usual TC pro Facebook stance, here’s what I have to say as a guy that makes his living off his email delivery rate….
With Facebook users first of all swamped with spam, group invites, MLM offers, Farmville alerts and so many unskilled marketers out to try to somehow make money off their time investment in Facebook…, I am NOT looking forward to seeing @facebook.com email addresses in my autoresponder stream.
As an email delivery consultant, I am thinking that FaceBook mail users are going to be very apt to click the spam button on you more so than other web mail clients.
Not to mention, just what we don’t need as marketers sending email to our double opt in lists is yet another email provider without a email whitelisting process, an unknown filtering process, no feedback loop and no experience in the good use of filtering.
Or as malicious as Facebook is at banning say…, an email series on YouTube rankings just because it promote’s a networking process that is pro Google. Or sending email to your list linking to something critical of Facebook. Being critical of Facebook will not get you any love, your email list loves Facebook, believe it or not they are very loyal. I would say if this blog post landed in a @facebook.com inbox it would draw spam button clicks simply in retaliation.
Or say Joe Jobs on Facebook, or sending lots of spam with links to your content, poorly skilled affiliates sending tons of links with your ClickBank products in them, or posing as you and getting you kicked off Facebook. I could go on and on. For now I will be considering denying Facebook email address in my autoresponder forms.
I will be back on Tuesday, till then watch this….
I will be back here Tuesday with the results of Facebook’s announcement, till then watch this eye opening video on raising your click thru and open rates in this CTR video with Sean Donahoe. I even learned a lot from Sean and I am taking this test data seriously and it’s worth 5 minutes of your time….
Can’t wait to hear your feedback on this, tell me in your comments below Please!
How To Screw Up Your Email Delivery, confuse your subscribers and get stuck in spam filters in one quick email or less
I do a lot of local speaking here in Phoenix where we have decided to settle for now.
So I get a lot of email from the MeetUp groups I participate in. But today one of my favorite MeetUps just really demonstrated with is wrong with most small emailers and I just have to share that with you for your own good.
If you are in the Phoenix area I highly recommend Club Entrepreneur. It is a great home for networking, the main floor holds up to 150 seats for public speaking, conference rooms and office space abounds as well. This is a great entrepreneurial setting for any business.
What they lack are Internet Marketing skills.
So here is the list of their mistakes. Are you making these bad moves too?
- Putting HTML in the text box…
- Putting text in the HTML box…
- Using a free email address in the from field
- Sending email from a social site that gets filtered easily
- Creating multiple social groups and double emailing
- Using digest emails with little focus
- All of the Above…
Here’s the details of the mistakes made by my friends at Club E (short for Club Entrepreneur).
Putting text in the HTML box…
I see major Internet marketers make this mistake all the time. In AWeber in the broadcast and the autoresponder interface there are two textareas that you can enter text in.
One is designated HTML and one is designated text. The HTML box is at the top of the AWeber interface, the text box is below that. Do not accidentally enter plain text in the HTML box by mistake. Your links will not be clickable in Outlook or other email clients as in my Outlook screen shot below.
You may not be catching this mistake if you are sending test emails to a web mail or free email browser account.
Solution: Always test your emails first both in a web client and always in Outlook.
Click image to see full size.
Using a free email address in the from field
It is the reply to field that is the problem here. Free email addresses set off spam filters, proven fact.
Set all your email distribution settings to the main account on your domain. That way you can set all accounts to one reply to address and control where replies are going to. Don’t spray replies to your emails all over the web on free accounts. You email replies are your best source of feedback, sales, clients and return traffic.
Either that or use the default for a social site like MeetUp, so the reply address is their domain. Never ever use a free email address as the reply to or from field. Why? Because it is what spammers do. Look at any spam you receive and it will almost always come from a free email address in the from field and or the reply to address.
Click image to see full size.
Sending email from a social site that gets filtered easily
Most users manage their lists thru MeetUp.com. The bad news is that most groups manage their email lists thru MeetUp.com. Tons of spam posts get posted to MeetUp boards and the default settings on any MeetUp group sends and email to the group members. So, I am guessing that the spam button gets clicked a lot.
Solution: Get members of MeetUp into your main site’s autoresponder. Howie Schwartz said it first and best: “Drag your followers on the social site out and into your own autoresponder”…
Creating multiple social groups and double mailing
My Friends at Club E have two different MeetUp groups. That means to mail all the members they have to double email. That creates confusion and double mailings at the members inbox many times within minutes of each other. Bad idea, avoid this at all costs.
Solution: Mail well in advance, and if you have multiple groups don’t mail them all on the same day within a few minutes of each other. Craft unique emails for each group and for your list.
Using digest emails dilutes the focus and lessens return
Lastly, if you look at the emails above, they are digest emails. Digest emails suck when it comes to getting your subscribers to do what you want. In fact, digest emails cause confusion, get caught in filters because spam many times has tons of links and usually perform poorly.
I suggest sending digest emails on the front end if you must, then send follow up emails that are focused on one action you want the members of your list to take.
All of the Above…
Let’s hope you are not making these kind of errors in your email marketing. If you are then you really need to learn how to “Get It To The Inbox” now more then ever.
What do you think? Tell us!
Let me know in the comments below. I want to hear from you, your best practices and what has failed and what has succeeded for you in the comments section below.
Links to your creatives are welcome below. Don’t be shy!
Now that Conficker is delivering it’s payload of spam, spam filters have been cranked up to their highest notch and email delivery is at an all time low, at least for me
After consulting my top contacts in the world of Internet security, spam filtering and network spam filtering appliances I can say without a doubt that spam filters are set at their highest level we have seen in a long time. I cannot reveal my sources, but they are top notch, this comes from the big firms.
I have lost allot of sales and subscribers that are not getting my emails and my open rate has suddenly fallen below 10%. It is not AWeber’s fault, it is my URLs and commercial slanted content.
My emails have been very commercial lately, because I am now in full launch of my Google Friend Connect Tactics members site and Jack Humphrey just JVed with me on this launch.
I have the best product and by far the highest value in any social marketing suite. So of course I want to shout it from the rooftops. The problem is no one is hearing me. Luckily I have some big affiliates or I would be pulling my hair out.
The best way that you can try to recover from this if you are experiencing the same is to ask anyone your can to check the spam folder and mark you emails as not spam.
Also whitelisting your email is still very effective especially in Gmail.
Ride it out, the worm will turn. What you don’t want to do is over email out of desperation.
Today I am sending a text only, no link email directing my readers to this blog. I will post back in the comments how it worked out. Hang in there, we have been here before, the filtering will come down. Try sending text articles without outgoing links and see how that works for you.
The Gmail new spam filter is really Google Friend Connect, disguised as a friends list the levels of permission now available in Gmail is a very effective spam filter.
This is an excerpt from my social marketing members only site. This is the kind of thinking and leading edge use of GFC you will find there.
This one should really blow your socks off. Google Friend Connect and the Google friends list in Gmail is not a friends list. It is a spam filter. Stay with me here this is really good stuff…
There are four levels of spam filtering in Gmail.
- Sites we have joined thru the Google Friend Connect widget.
- Sites you have not joined.
- Gmail users not listed in your contacts.
- Gmail users who are listed in contacts and friends lists in Gmail.
- Those that are listed in Chat.
- Those listed in Google Latitude.
Thinking about Google the other day and the fact that I get so little spam that this just rolled right in. Many of you have followed me for a while now and you remember back to when a mistaken Trend Micro false positive destroyed my business.
What I never explained is that my Google friends list as well as my social contacts in Facebook are what saved me. The only reason I continued to deliver email to anyone was thru my Gmail friends list. Because I was a very early adopter of Google Friend Connect and was out to build a list in Gmail early on, I had many mutual friends in the eyes of Google.
When you become mutual friends in any of the Google applications: GFC widgets, Gchat, Google Lattitude, you are automatically added, your Gmail address that is, to each other’s Gmail contacts list.
Now as a social marketer, I think that is cool, however from an email standpoint, getting your email to the Inbox is how you make money. What easier way is there than getting you visitors to friend you thru a GFC widget?
Then Google does you work for you! There is also no whitelisting process for email delivery in Gmail and no public FBL (feed back loop) for receiving spam button click complaints. These are the basic necessities we use as emailers to keep getting our email delivered.
Google has replaced this process by using levels of trust. I am just theorizing here so I cannot say this is fact and we will never know if it is.
Google levels of trust
Level of trust #1.Let’s say you have joined my site thru the GFC widget on your right. Then Google would definitely deliver email from that site to your Gmail inbox. Since it was YOU who established the relationship.
Level of trust #2. Let’s say that you and I are mutual friends made through GFC and now have each others address in our Gmail contacts. I would say our emails to each other would definitely get delivered.
Level of trust #3. Let’s say that I have sent you a chat invitation and you have accepted and we now both show in each others chat widget. I would say this is an even higher indicator that our emails to each other should go directly to the Inbox.
Level of trust #4. Let’s say you have sent me a Google Latitude request and you and I now share our locations at what ever level in Google Latitude. I would hazard to say that our emails are DEFINITELY going to land in each others Inbox at this point.
Can you see how Google is using what normally is a social site to better deliver what we want all want? I don’t know about you but I want NO SPAM and I want my EMAIL NOW, not after searching the spam folder for an hour.
This only happens when you use a Gmail address. You only get the advantage of these social features when you use a Gmail address to log into Google applications like Google Lattitude. So go get one. If you do not understand how to set up Google Friend Connect properly you can get my FREE Google Friend Connect Tutorial here and watch my Google Friend Connect YouTube Channel here.
AWeber links are breaking in Gmail due to an unknown line break
The reason I caught this was one of my subscribers replied to my email on an unrealted issue after I sent an email to my Google Friend Connect list with a new update on what Google is really doing.
Just got off the phone with an AWeber admin and we could not replicate the broken URL from emails from my AWeber list to my Gmail address.
AWeber assured me that they go to extreme lengths to make sure the tracking links never get truncated. We believe that it was a keystroke on the part of my Gmail subscriber. We shall see and we will be monitoring this closely.
If any of you can replicate the broken string from your accounts then please let me know and AWeber as well. I will publish any screen shots you care to send and link to any of your own blog posts.
Tom Kulzer just emailed me and assured me that this was a line break introduced by the sender. For the moment we cannot replicate the string truncation.
More tomorrow and I will keep you up to date. This is one time I am glad to very possibly be wrong. – Chris Lang
I checked it at all possible resolutions down to 800 X 600 and it breaks in the same place.
I am sure it is due to a querystring length because no matter the screen resolution the AWeber click tracking link breaks in the same place ever time.
This screen shot is taken at 1280 X 1024 and is full size as it would be in my browser. You can click the image to see the full size screen shot of the Gmail email body center column.
Here it is at 800 pixels wide and it breaks in the same place.
I am sending Tom Kulzer a link to this today and I will publish his response to me if he allows me to.
If AWeber responds on their own site I will link to it and send you all an email to the fix (hopefully).
For now I am not going to be using the redirect links and simply linking without tracking to my landing pages.
Facebook listed as a phishing site. Why?
The following domain is now listed as a phishing site by Google chrome and Firefox. http://fbcdn.net
UPDATE:Just in, TechCrunch just reported that Safari is now listing Facebook as a suspicious site too. You can read their article in the trackback in comments where they linked to this artilce. (Cheers! Robin Wauters, thanks for the link…)
This is actually a Facebook domain. By adding this domain to your list of trusted sites in Internet Explorer you will no longer have problems with Facebook. Currently Internet Explorer is not listing it as a phishing site in it’s database. Could this be because Microsoft has $260,000,000 invested in Facebook?
Basically the only way to use Facebook is to use Internet Explorer because they do not seem to be blocking it right now.
I am trying to get to the bottom of the Phishing RBL now, I am already taking this up with Trend Micro to make sure this does not spread. Trend Micro blocking my site made me quite an authority on Phishing filters and URL RBLs.
Currently the phishing filter used by Firefox does not list fbdcn.net as a phishing site and neither does Internet Explorer anti Phishing filter. Don’t know where this blocking is coming from but I want to know as someone who cannot wait to implement Facebook Connect.
The link to the information about CDNs was provided — companies like Akamai have servers placed strategically around the world and use some DNS voodoo to have localized requests directed to their servers nearest to the request. This means that you can download the data faster.
Another reason is about bandwidth. Facebook (and all sorts of other sites where you have to login) track all sorts of information about you in cookies. Every request you make to a site, all of those cookies get passed around. This can add up very quickly. By having a domain that isn’t just a subdomain (ie, x.facebook.com) like fbcdn.net, each request isn’t burdened with the additional cookies and thus minimizes the bandwidth required on the request (you transmit less, so it’s faster; they receive less so it’s faster and cheaper [since they pay for all that in and out bandwidth])
I’m sure there could be even more reasons, but those are the main ones AFAIK.
This puts a real damper of the launch of Facebook Connect.
I will keep updating this post as news breaks on this. Either the Facebook domain fbcdn.net was hacked or this is something odd, I have not seen this occur before.
UPDATE:Facebook says the blocking has been cleared in the Facebook Forum. This is the same place I tried to warn Facebook that this was a possibility. The other developers said:
“This is some pretty tinfoil hat sounding stuff.”
I happen to like the way my monitor reflects off my tin foil hat, what’s it to ya?